The Egyptian
Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR) urged the Egyptian government today to
give priority to the protection of citizens’ right to health during its
implementation of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual
Property Rights (TRIPS). The EIPR recommended that the government uses all
flexibilities inherent in the TRIPS agreement such as compulsory licensing to
manufacture medicines locally and parallel importation of medicines to ensure
the people’s economic access to essential drugs.
A policy paper
published today by the EIPR’s Health and Human Rights Program and entitled
“The TRIPS Agreement and Egypt’s Responsibility to Protect the Right to
Health,” analyzes the expected impact of the TRIPS agreement on Egypt’s
ability to fulfill its duty to protect the right to health of citizens
according to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights. The document also offers a rights-based overview of the rules
stipulated by the agreement concerning drug patents, and a similar analysis to
the Egyptian Intellectual Property law and its Executive Statutes.
The policy paper
aims at raising the public awareness of the different aspects of the TRIPS and
its effects on the right to health in light of the clear lack of information
provided by the government on the issue, and its failure to involve civil
society and the public in consultations for planning the phase after the
agreement's entry into force.
The TRIPS
agreement, which came into force in Egypt on 1 January 2005, protects drug
patents for a period of 20 years of filing the patent request. Egypt will be
obliged to protect the patents of drugs whose term has not yet expired as well
as drugs that will be developed and registered in the future. The strict
protection of drug patents results inevitably in a sharp rise in drug prices
especially in developing countries, which would consequently hamper people’s
access to essential medicines in violation of their right to health.
“People's health
should come before the profits of large pharmaceutical companies. The Egyptian
government has a legal obligation to take immediate, practical steps to avoid
the adverse effect of the TRIPS on access to essential medicines in Egypt,"
Aya El-Hilaly, EIPR's Health and Human Rights Program Officer, said today.
Such measures should include the establishment of the Medicine Subsidy Fund,
stipulated in the Intellectual Property Law; issuing compulsory licenses to
manufacture medicines that are unavailable in the local market or available at
excessively high prices; and the parallel importation of medicines which,
although not mentioned explicitly in the Egyptian Intellectual Property Law,
is permissible under the TRIPS.
The EIPR also
called on the Egyptian government to adopt a more open and transparent
attitude through making public all relevant information about the
implementation of the TRIPS and its effect on Egypt and the government's
strategies to deal with the increase in drug prices after January 2005.
The EIPR also
recommended that members of Parliament use parliamentary supervisory
mechanisms to monitor the government’s implementation of the TRIPS so that it
would not affect individual’s right to health and to raise this issue in
Parliamentary debates. It also urged both the Doctors’ and the Pharmacists’
Syndicates to maintain their pressure on the government to refrain from
raising the prices of essential medicines and to request that it uses the
flexibilities of compulsory licensing or parallel importation.